Here is the abstract.
Here is the method.
Comparison of generation results across different methods
Flux1.dev-Original
1.0$\times$ speed
TaylorSeer($N=2,O=1$)
1.9$\times$ speed
ScalingCache($S_f=14$)
2.1$\times$ speed
ScalingCache($S_f=10$)
3.0$\times$ speed
Click image to view details
Flux1.dev-Original
1.0$\times$ speed
TaylorSeer($N=2,O=1$)
1.9$\times$ speed
ScalingCache($S_f=14$)
2.1$\times$ speed
ScalingCache($S_f=10$)
3.0$\times$ speed
Click image to view details
Flux1.dev-Original
1.0$\times$ speed
TaylorSeer($N=2,O=1$)
1.9$\times$ speed
ScalingCache($S_f=14$)
2.1$\times$ speed
ScalingCache($S_f=10$)
3.0$\times$ speed
Click image to view details
Flux1.dev-Original
1.0$\times$ speed
TaylorSeer($N=2,O=1$)
1.9$\times$ speed
ScalingCache($S_f=14$)
2.1$\times$ speed
ScalingCache($S_f=10$)
3.0$\times$ speed
Click image to view details
Flux1.dev-Original
1.0$\times$ speed
TaylorSeer($N=2,O=1$)
1.9$\times$ speed
ScalingCache($S_f=14$)
2.1$\times$ speed
ScalingCache($S_f=10$)
3.0$\times$ speed
Click image to view details
Flux1.dev-Original
1.0$\times$ speed
TaylorSeer($N=2,O=1$)
1.9$\times$ speed
ScalingCache($S_f=14$)
2.1$\times$ speed
ScalingCache($S_f=10$)
3.0$\times$ speed
Click image to view details
Flux1.dev-Original
1.0$\times$ speed
TaylorSeer($N=2,O=1$)
1.9$\times$ speed
ScalingCache($S_f=14$)
2.1$\times$ speed
ScalingCache($S_f=10$)
3.0$\times$ speed
Click image to view details
Flux1.dev-Original
1.0$\times$ speed
TaylorSeer($N=2,O=1$)
1.9$\times$ speed
ScalingCache($S_f=14$)
2.1$\times$ speed
ScalingCache($S_f=10$)
3.0$\times$ speed
Click image to view details
Flux1.dev-Original
1.0$\times$ speed
TaylorSeer($N=2,O=1$)
1.9$\times$ speed
ScalingCache($S_f=14$)
2.1$\times$ speed
ScalingCache($S_f=10$)
3.0$\times$ speed
Click image to view details
BibTex Code Here